

The embedded version below is facilitated by. This is left as an exercise for the reader. Until this is configurable nothing can be done short of symlinking the locations to the right places. That is a hidden folder under /Library/Duplicacy. duplicacy/cache and some of the logs still go under. However, Duplicacy still places cache under. Note: Logs that duplicacy outputs to stdout and stderr go to /Library/Logs/Duplicacy.
#DUPLICACY VSS FULL#
Note: Every time you re-generate the bundle you would need to remove and re-add it to Full Disk Access. Please drag the generated app bundle ( Duplicacy-Backup.app by default) to Full Disk Access section in the System Preferences | Security & Privacy | Privacy | Full Disk Access. The script will generate wrapper executable and open Finder in the enclosed folder.
#DUPLICACY VSS INSTALL#
This boils down to doing something along these lines when initializing the repository:īrew install platypus cpulimit wget jq curl On Linux, Duplicacy Web Edition is provided as executables and no installation is required. Installation is needed before you can start the executable. On Windows and macOS, Duplicacy Web Edition is provided as installers. The user guide for the old GUI version can be found here.
#DUPLICACY VSS DOWNLOAD#
If any of these can utilize multithreaded upload, I’ll test them with larger dataset (>10Gb).This is a handy script to download and install duplicacy CLI and configure it to run under launchd to backup all users, without the need to disable SIP. I’ll try to test Backblaze B2 and Wasabi next. So far, CY is faster in all cases except restore, but data asks for more testing - with different provides and larger data set…ĬY did not use more than one upload/download thread for Google Drive - I bet it can improve speed with different destination.ĬY also does not require local DB, which might be beneficial in some recovery cases. I realized that CY does not support WebDav ot Box - so can’t test against these. Obviously, source data set is relatively small (but large enough for test scenario testing). However - so far, results are a bit inconclusive. I don’t think that compression and DB size matters much… The whole fact of having a separate DB in TI vs using file system as DB by CY makes the most interesting difference.

#DUPLICACY VSS ZIP#
Using the most standard compression - infozip’s zip 3.0 with all defaults, source compresses to 998,508,177 bytes, which is on pair with 1st snapshot size of both tools. Can you provide a “compressabilty” ratio for the source data?
